【TV Series Archives】

It appears that,TV Series Archives just like misery, an investigation into possible discriminatory ad practices facilitated by a tech giant loves company.

Following the March 28 revelation that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has filed charges against Facebook for allegedly violating the Fair Housing Act, the Washington Postnow reports that Google and Twitter are under investigation by the same agency. And for more or less the same thing.

SEE ALSO: Facebook belatedly makes it harder to run some discriminatory ads

It turns out that HUD is looking into the super specific ad-targeting features offered by the companies in an effort to determine if they facilitate housing discrimination. An advertising platform that, say, allows the owner of an apartment complex to purposefully exclude certain groups — such as people of color — from seeing new listings would be in violation of the law.

Facebook settled a lawsuit about this very unfortunate feature of its site earlier this month, but that apparently wasn't enough to remove it from HUD's sights.

“Even as we confront new technologies, the fair housing laws enacted over half a century ago remain clear—discrimination in housing-related advertising is against the law," HUD general counsel Paul Compton said in a March 28 press release. "Just because a process to deliver advertising is opaque and complex doesn’t mean that it exempts Facebook and others from our scrutiny and the law of the land."

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Notice the "and others" bit of that statement? Yeah, so did we.

Trouble. Credit: Smith Collection / Gado / getty

According to the Post, HUD told Twitter and Google last year that it was looking into similar violations at their respective companies. Unsurprisingly, Twitter is not stoked to be on the receiving end of such an investigation.

"Twitter doesn't allow discriminatory advertising on our platform," a Twitter spokesperson told Mashable over email. "Someone using Twitter to advertise agrees to comply with the law and not use our services for illegal activities. Discrimination in housing and employment is against the law and against our rules."  

Likewise, Google made it abundantly clear in a statement to Mashable that it is not down with enabling or facilitating illegal discrimination.

“We’ve had policies in place for many years that prohibit targeting ads on the basis of sensitive categories like race, ethnicity, religious beliefs, disability status, negative financial standing, etc," a spokesperson wrote via email. "Our policies are designed to protect users and ensure that advertisers are using our platforms in a responsible manner."

Yes, policies designed to protect users are great! It's just that sometimes, as Facebook, Google, and Twitter repeatedly remind us, policies alone don't mean much when divorced from the actual product being offered. Especially if the product in question straight up helps bad actors break the law.

---

Featured Video For You

---

Delete Facebook says WhatsApp co-founder

---

Topics Facebook Google X/Twitter

• Science
• Entertainment
• Deals
• Tech
• Digital Culture
• Social Good
• Life
• Shopping

• Parental Controls: How to Lock Down Your Kids' iOS Devices
• 'The Simpsons' includes an ironic nod to its Trump election prediction
• Jim Parsons to star in 'Brother Orange' movie about China's internet phenom
• Samsung to acquire Harman for $8 billion
• NYT Connections hints and answers for May 10: Tips to solve 'Connections' #699.
• 'StarCraft II' pro Scarlett is the top
• Gorgeous 'Beauty and the Beast' trailer is exactly what you need today
• Australians decide the supermoon super
• I'm a college professor. My advice to young people who feel hooked on tech
• John Lewis Christmas ad gets a brilliant election makeover

• Why Migraines are the Most Glamorous of Headaches
• Learn More About the Cover of Issue 211
• AI anxiety and employee monitoring: Workplace stress mounts
• The Morning News Roundup for December 2, 2014
• The Morning News Roundup for December 1, 2014
• The Windows on the World Contest Finalists
• Best hair deal: Laifen Swift hair dryer on sale for only $119 at Amazon
• Musk borrowed $1 billion from SpaceX the same month he acquired Twitter: Report
• Listening to Paradise Lost
• Duolingo is adding music lessons to the syllabus

• AMD Radeon RX 550 + Intel Pentium G4560
• We can't tell if people are making fun of this anti
• Watch: Colourful 'earthquake lights' illuminate New Zealand skies
• WhatsApp hits 160 million active users in India, its biggest market
• Watch how an old Venus spacecraft tumbled before crashing to Earth
• Apple Pay adds nonprofit donations and the timing is totally a coincidence
• 14 times Dumbledore was the greatest fictional character of all time
• How to take a smartphone picture of the supermoon that isn't a blurry blob
• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for April 29, 2025
• Vivo V5 with 20

• Best rope light deal: Save 25% on Lepro N1 AI Smart RGB LED Strip Lights
• Adele says g'day from the other side with perfect letter to Australia
• Check out the trailer for 'SNL' star Michael Che's Netflix special
• Even kids on Club Penguin staged an anti
• Best portable power station deal: Save $179.01 on the EcoFlow River 2 Max
• Keep your legs warm with your quotes from your favorite books
• Vandals transform Soviet star into Patrick Star from Spongebob
• This is why an entire country's health care system shouldn't be on the same email list
• Best Amazon Fire TV Cube deal: Save $30 at Amazon
• Jackie Chan finally receives an Oscar, after all those years of broken bones