Facebook may soon have define auto eroticismnew rules for "deepfakes."
That's according to Mark Zuckerberg, who said Wednesday that the company is currently discussing specific policies that would police deepfakes, a term that refers to videos that have been realistically manipulated using artificial intelligence.
The issue was recently thrust into the spotlight after a manipulated video of Nancy Pelosi went viral on the platform. The video, which experts said had been slowed down, made the Speaker of the House's speech sound slurred as if she were drunk. Facebook's fact checkers eventually marked the video as false, but it had already spread widely before Facebook down-ranked it in users' News Feeds.
Speaking at the Aspen Ideas festival, Mark Zuckerberg called the company's handling of the Pelosi video a "mistake in execution."
"It took awhile for our systems to flag that and for fact checkers to rate it as false ... it got more distribution than our policies should have allowed," he said.
Now, he says Facebook is working on changing its policies so that it might be better able to address deepfakes, but that it first needs to be able to define what a deepfake actually is.
I do think that saying deepfakes are different form misinformation is a reasonable perspective. We need to make sure that we define what a deepfake is very clearly. Is it manipulated media using AI that makes someone say something that they didn't say? I think that that's probably a pretty reasonable definition, but if it's any video that's cut in a way that someone thinks is misleading, then well I know a lot of people who have done TV interviews that have been cut in ways that they didn't like and that they think change the definition or the meaning of what they were trying to say. And I think you want to make sure that you're scoping this carefully enough that you're not giving people the grounds or precedent to argue that the things that they don't like, that change the meaning somewhat of what they said when they were doing an interview, get taken down.
Zuckerberg didn't indicate what, if any, new rules the company might implement for manipulated videos, but his comments highlight just how thorny the issue has become for Facebook. Besides the Pelosi video, which Pelosi herself slammed the company for, the issue is likely to come up again as the 2020 election approaches and Facebook continues to fend off foreign meddling.
The issue has caught the attention of other lawmakers as well. Earlier this month the House Intelligence Committee held a hearing on the issue, which experts have said could pose a national security risk.
Topics Facebook Social Media
Best home security deals: Save big on wireless doorbells, cameras, and more.Swedish pole vaulter Mondo Duplantis breaks his world record — and the internet'Industry' Season 3 review: HBO's finance drama has never been betterA violent event occurred on Alaska's fat bear livestreamNYT Strands hints, answers for August 7Zoom has launched an AIDistraction Control: Safari now lets you hide parts of web pagesThis week's best Ninja deals [August 2024]'The Umbrella Academy' ends with the perfect final songDistraction Control: Safari now lets you hide parts of web pagesBackground check company breached, nearly 3 billion exposed in data theft'False, misleading and damaging': Microsoft slams Delta for CrowdStrike outage blameReddit CEO hints that subreddit paywalls are on the wayX is testing the removal of like, comment, and repost buttons from repliesBest deals under $50: Save big on headphones, Ninja kitchen products, and smart home techBest kitchen deal: Smart tea kettle dealLegion Go Lite: Lenovo appears to accidentally leak new Steam Deck rival'Cuckoo' review: Hunter Schafer soars in kooky body horror gemApple is about to smallify its Mac mini even moreWhere to pre Recapping Dante: Your Mid Strawberry Fields by Sadie Stein T. S. Eliot’s Darker Side, A Poem by Maxine Kumin, and Other News From the Margins by Dan Piepenbring The Morning Roundup for January 21, 2014 This Month’s Most Expensive eBooks The Morning Roundup for January 31, 2014 A Brief History of the Snowball Fight by Sadie Stein Visible Man: An Interview with Mitchell S. Jackson by Tim Small Recapping Dante: Canto 17, or Dante Goes to Los Angeles by Alexander Aciman Last Call for Our Subscription Deal with McSweeney’s! What We’re Loving: Pragmatism, Professional Consultants, Pubic Crests by The Paris Review The Morning News Roundup for February 17, 2014 The Hidden History of Warren G. Harding Our Subscription Deal with McSweeney's Is Worth Bragging About Choose Your Own Erotic Adventure—If You Can What We’re Reading on Valentine’s Day An Excerpt from Samuel Foote’s The Nabob W. H. Auden at the 92nd Street Y Jerry McGill: Sun Records artist, Memphis fixture, and “crazy sonuvabitch.”
1.7083s , 10194.765625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【define auto eroticism】,Miracle Information Network